What is the role and responsibilities of a mandatary?
In Quebec, a mandatary is a person who is authorized to act on behalf of another person. Depending on the circumstances, this authority may arise from an ordinary mandate, commonly associated with a power of attorney, or from a protection mandate intended to operate when the person who made it becomes incapable of caring for themselves or administering their property.
Although the word “mandatary” can describe different types of representatives, the underlying principle is similar: the mandatary does not become the owner of the property or rights being administered. The mandatary acts for another person and must exercise the powers entrusted to them within the limits of their authority.
This distinction is particularly important when a mandatary has access to bank accounts, investments, real estate or other valuable property. Authority to administer property is not authority to treat that property as one’s own.
What is a mandatary in Quebec?
A mandate is an arrangement through which one person, the mandator, gives another person, the mandatary, the power to perform certain acts on the mandator’s behalf.
The mandate may be very limited. For example, a person may authorize someone to sign a particular document, complete a transaction or deal with an institution. It may also be broader and permit the mandatary to administer various financial or property matters.
The scope of the mandatary’s authority therefore depends largely on the mandate itself.
A mandatary should not assume that a general authorization permits every conceivable transaction. Banks, government authorities, notaries and other institutions may also require satisfactory evidence of the mandatary’s authority before accepting instructions.
What are the main responsibilities of a mandatary?
A mandatary is expected to act prudently, honestly and in accordance with the mandate.
This generally requires the mandatary to understand what powers have actually been granted, use those powers for their intended purpose and avoid acting outside the mandate.
When administering property, a mandatary should normally maintain sufficient records to explain what was received, paid, transferred or otherwise done with the property under administration.
Depending on the nature of the mandate, appropriate administration may include keeping invoices and receipts, maintaining banking records, documenting significant decisions, monitoring expenses and preserving records relating to transactions made on behalf of the mandator.
Good recordkeeping becomes especially important if the administration continues for several years or involves substantial assets.
Does a mandatary own the property being administered?
No. A mandatary who administers another person’s property does not become its owner merely because the mandatary has signing authority, access to an account or broad administrative powers.
The distinction between ownership and administration should remain clear.
For example, access to a bank account for administrative purposes does not necessarily give the mandatary the right to use the funds personally. Similarly, authority concerning a property does not automatically allow the mandatary to transfer the property to themselves, make gifts or use it for purposes unrelated to the mandate.
Transactions benefiting the mandatary personally can create serious difficulties, particularly where the mandate does not clearly authorize them.
What is the difference between a power of attorney and a protection mandate?
The distinction is fundamental.
An ordinary mandate or power of attorney generally allows a person to authorize another individual to act for them while they are capable of making their own decisions. It is commonly used for banking, property, business or administrative matters.
A protection mandate serves a different purpose. It is prepared in anticipation of incapacity and sets out who should take responsibility for the person, their property, or both if incapacity occurs.
A protection mandate does not generally become fully operational simply because relatives believe that the person is no longer capable. A formal process is normally required to establish incapacity and give effect to the mandate.
This means that a person named as mandatary in a protection mandate should not automatically assume that the document gives immediate authority to administer the person’s affairs.
What does a mandatary under a protection mandate do?
The responsibilities depend on the wording of the protection mandate.
A mandatary may be responsible for the protection and personal well-being of the incapable person, administration of their property, or both. A mandate may also divide these responsibilities between different people.
Property administration can involve paying ordinary expenses, managing accounts, maintaining property, dealing with investments, collecting income, communicating with institutions and making other financial decisions permitted by the mandate.
Responsibilities relating to the person can involve decisions concerning living arrangements, care and general well-being, depending on the powers granted and the circumstances.
The mandatary must always remember that the role exists for the benefit and protection of the person represented.
Must a mandatary keep records?
Proper records are one of the most important safeguards in any administration of another person’s property.
A mandatary should be able to distinguish the mandator’s transactions from their own and explain significant movements of money or property.
The extent of the accounting required can vary according to the mandate and the type of administration involved. Nevertheless, inadequate documentation can create substantial problems.
Years later, family members, heirs, another representative or other interested persons may question withdrawals, transfers, expenses or dispositions of property. A transaction that was legitimate may become difficult to explain if no supporting records were retained.
For that reason, systematic recordkeeping should begin when the administration begins, rather than when a dispute arises.
Can a mandatary use the mandator’s money for personal expenses?
A mandatary should not treat the mandator’s assets as a personal source of funds.
Personal use of the mandator’s money can create a conflict between the mandatary’s interests and the interests of the person represented.
Questions can become particularly complicated where the mandatary and mandator already share expenses, own property together or have historically transferred money between themselves. In these situations, careful documentation is particularly important because the distinction between a legitimate transaction and an unauthorized personal benefit may later be disputed.
The fact that the mandatary is a spouse, child, sibling or close relative does not, by itself, eliminate the obligations associated with administering another person’s property.
Can a mandatary make gifts?
A mandatary should be particularly cautious about gifts, donations and transactions that reduce the mandator’s property without a corresponding benefit.
The ability to make such transactions depends on the powers granted and the surrounding circumstances. A broad authority to administer property should not automatically be interpreted as unlimited authority to give it away.
This issue frequently becomes sensitive when gifts are made to the mandatary personally, to members of the mandatary’s family or to selected future heirs.
If the authority is uncertain, the safest approach is generally to clarify the mandatary’s powers before completing a significant transaction rather than attempting to justify it afterward.
What is a conflict of interest?
A conflict of interest can arise when the mandatary’s personal interests compete with the interests of the person represented.
Examples may include selling property to oneself, transferring money into a personal account, purchasing assets from the mandator at a questionable price, forgiving a debt owed by the mandatary or arranging transactions that primarily benefit the mandatary.
Not every transaction involving a mandatary is necessarily improper. The difficulty is that self-interested transactions require particularly careful consideration of the mandate, the circumstances and the interests of the person represented.
Transparency and documentation are therefore essential.
Can a mandatary sell real estate?
A mandatary may sometimes have authority to deal with real estate, but the existence and extent of that authority must be determined from the mandate and the nature of the proposed transaction.
Selling a property is a significant act. The mandatary should verify that the mandate provides sufficient authority and that all required formalities can be satisfied.
Additional concerns can arise where the purchaser is the mandatary, a relative of the mandatary or someone connected to them. Such transactions may raise questions about conflicts of interest, valuation and whether the transaction genuinely serves the interests of the person represented.
Can a mandatary delegate responsibilities to someone else?
A mandatary should not automatically assume that the responsibilities entrusted personally to them can simply be transferred to another person.
It is common and often necessary to obtain professional assistance with particular tasks. Accountants, investment professionals, property managers and other specialists may assist with an administration.
Obtaining assistance, however, is different from transferring the mandatary’s decision-making authority altogether.
The wording of the mandate and the nature of the responsibility should therefore be examined before another person is given authority to act.
Is a mandatary entitled to compensation?
Whether a mandatary is entitled to compensation can depend on the type of mandate, its wording and the circumstances.
Reimbursement of legitimate expenses incurred while carrying out the mandate is also distinct from compensation for the mandatary’s time and work.
A mandatary should therefore avoid simply deciding on an amount of compensation and withdrawing it from the property being administered without first determining whether there is a proper basis for doing so.
Clear records should be maintained for both expenses and any compensation received.
What happens if several mandataries are appointed?
A mandate can appoint more than one mandatary.
The document may require them to act together, assign different responsibilities to each person or provide another mechanism for decision-making.
For example, one mandatary may be responsible for personal welfare while another administers property. Alternatively, two people may be required to participate in certain financial decisions.
Where several mandataries are involved, the wording of the mandate becomes particularly important. One mandatary should not assume that they can act independently if the mandate requires joint participation.
Disagreements between mandataries can also interfere with administration and may require a formal solution if they cannot be resolved.
What happens when a mandatary exceeds their authority?
Actions outside the scope of a mandate can create significant legal and financial consequences.
The transaction may be challenged, the mandatary may be required to explain their administration, and questions of reimbursement or personal liability may arise.
The consequences depend on what occurred, the mandatary’s authority, the effect of the transaction and whether the person represented suffered a loss.
For this reason, uncertainty about the scope of a mandate should ideally be addressed before a major transaction is completed.
Can a mandatary be replaced?
Problems sometimes arise because a mandatary is unable or unwilling to perform the role, fails to communicate, does not maintain adequate records, becomes involved in a serious conflict of interest or is suspected of mismanaging property.
The available solution depends on whether the arrangement is an ordinary mandate or a protection mandate and on the circumstances of the person represented.
Where the mandator remains capable, they may generally have considerably more control over whether another person should continue acting for them.
Where a protection mandate is operating because the mandator is incapable, changing the person responsible can be more complicated and may require formal intervention.
What happens when the mandator dies?
A mandate should not be confused with the administration of an estate.
The death of the mandator fundamentally changes the legal situation. A person who had authority to administer the deceased’s affairs during their lifetime should not simply assume that the same authority continues after death.
After death, responsibility for the deceased’s property passes into the framework applicable to the succession and its liquidator or other authorized representatives.
This transition also makes recordkeeping important. Transactions completed by the mandatary before death may later need to be explained so that the deceased’s property, debts and financial history can be properly identified.
Can heirs ask questions about a former mandatary’s administration?
After the mandator’s death, questions sometimes arise about transactions that occurred while a power of attorney or protection mandate was being used.
Heirs may discover withdrawals, transfers, sales, gifts or other transactions that they do not understand. The existence of such transactions does not automatically establish wrongdoing, but unexplained transactions can lead to disputes.
Financial statements, invoices, contracts, receipts and other administrative records can help establish what occurred and why.
Where important transactions cannot be explained, further verification or formal measures may become necessary.
Common problems involving mandataries
Disputes involving a mandatary frequently result from unclear authority, poor recordkeeping or conflicts between family members.
Typical issues include:
- uncertainty about whether the mandate authorizes a particular transaction;
- mixing the mandatary’s money with the mandator’s money;
- undocumented cash withdrawals;
- transfers to the mandatary or relatives;
- disagreements about compensation;
- gifts made from the mandator’s assets;
- failure to preserve invoices and banking records;
- disagreements between multiple mandataries;
- continuation of transactions after the mandatary’s authority has changed or ended;
- refusal to provide information concerning the administration.
Many of these problems can be reduced by treating the administration as a separate and documented responsibility from the beginning.
Practical precautions for a mandatary
Before undertaking substantial property administration, a mandatary should understand the precise source and limits of their authority.
Separate and organized records should be maintained throughout the administration. Important financial decisions should be documented, and transactions involving a personal benefit to the mandatary should receive particular scrutiny.
When the mandate is unclear, when a transaction is unusual or when competing interests are involved, obtaining clarification before proceeding can prevent a much larger dispute later.
The mandatary is a representative, not a substitute owner
The central principle is straightforward: a mandatary receives authority, not ownership.
Whether acting under a power of attorney or a protection mandate, the mandatary occupies a position of responsibility. The mandatary must respect the limits of the mandate, administer property carefully, preserve appropriate records, avoid improper personal benefit and remain able to explain the decisions made on behalf of the person represented.
Understanding this distinction protects both the person whose affairs are being administered and the mandatary who has accepted the responsibility.
This text is provided for legal information purposes only. If you have a specific question regarding your personal situation, please contact a lawyer.
Allen Madelin Avocats offer consultations both in person and via videoconference. The first consultation is offered for $125.For more information, please contact us by telephone: 1 514 904 4017 or by e-mail: [email protected].
